Machine Learning

Infographics

Jupyter notebooks

 

Deep Learning

Infographics

  1. Feedforward Neural Networks (FFNN) / Multilayer Perceptrons (MLP)
  2. Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) / ConvNets
  3. Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN)
  4. Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) Networks
  5. Gated Recurrent Units (GRU)
  6. Autoencoders (AE)
  7. Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs)
  8. Transformer Networks (TN)
  9. Graph Neural Networks (GNNs)
  10. Residual Networks (ResNets)
  11. Densely Connected Convolutional Networks (DenseNets)

Jupyter notebooks

Deep Learning

  1. Feedforward Neural Networks (FFNN) / Multilayer Perceptrons (MLP)
  2. Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) / ConvNets
  3. Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN)
  4. Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) Networks
  5. Gated Recurrent Units (GRU)
  6. Autoencoders (AE)
  7. Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs)
  8. Transformer Networks (TN)
  9. Graph Neural Networks (GNNs)
  10. Residual Networks (ResNets)
  11. Densely Connected Convolutional Networks (DenseNets)

AI Agents and Scientists

Infographics


2023 Coscientist Carnegie Mellon (Boiko, Gomes et al.) - GPT-4 agent that searched documentation, planned and executed chemistry experiments on robotic hardware, including optimising palladium-catalysed cross-couplings.
→ Published in Nature, Dec 2023 
2023 FunSearch Google DeepMind - Evolves programs with an LLM and an automatic evaluator. Found larger cap sets in dimension 8 than previously known and better bin-packing heuristics.
→ First LLM-driven discovery on an open maths problem
2024 ChemCrow EPFL & Rochester (Bran, Schwaller et al.) - LLM equipped with 18 expert chemistry tools for synthesis planning, executed on a cloud robotic lab.
→ Tool use as the route to domain competence
2024 The AI Scientist Sakana AI, Oxford, UBC - Template-based pipeline from idea to code, experiments, LaTeX paper and an automated reviewer, for small ML research problems.
→ ≈ $15 per paper; later published in Nature (2026)
2025 Agent Laboratory AMD & Johns Hopkins (Schmidgall et al.) - Literature review, experimentation and report writing, with an optional co-pilot mode where a human gives feedback at each stage.
→ Human feedback improved output quality
2025 AI co-scientist Google Research & DeepMind - Multi-agent Gemini system: generation, reflection, Elo-ranked tournaments, evolution and meta-review. Proposed drug-repurposing candidates for AML validated in vitro.
→ Generate → debate → evolve
2025 AI Scientist-v2 Sakana AI - Drops human-written templates in favour of agentic tree search with an experiment manager and a vision-language reviewer of figures.
→ A fully generated paper passed ICLR 2025 workshop review
2025 AlphaEvolve Google DeepMind - Evolutionary coding agent using Gemini models. Multiplies 4×4 complex matrices with 48 scalar multiplications and improved scheduling heuristics in Google's data centres.
→ Beat Strassen's 1969 bound of 49 for this case
2025 Robin FutureHouse - Chains literature and data-analysis agents with human-run wet-lab assays. Proposed ripasudil as a candidate treatment for dry age-related macular degeneration.
→ Hypothesis → assay → analysis loop
2025 Kosmos Edison Scientific & FutureHouse - Runs for up to 12 hours with a structured world model, reading ~1,500 papers and executing ~42,000 lines of analysis code per run. Reports cite the code or paper behind each claim.
→ 79.4% of statements judged accurate

Jupyter Notebooks

References

 

Machine-Learned Force Fields

Infographics



  1. J. Behler, M. Parrinello, Generalized neural-network representation of high-dimensional potential-energy surfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 146401 (2007). doi
  2. A. P. Bartók, M. C. Payne, R. Kondor, G. Csányi, Gaussian approximation potentials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 136403 (2010). doi
  3. A. P. Bartók, R. Kondor, G. Csányi, On representing chemical environments (SOAP), Phys. Rev. B 87, 184115 (2013). doi
  4. J. S. Smith, O. Isayev, A. E. Roitberg, ANI-1: an extensible neural network potential with DFT accuracy at force field computational cost, Chem. Sci. 8, 3192 (2017). doi
  5. K. T. Schütt et al., SchNet – A deep learning architecture for molecules and materials, J. Chem. Phys. 148, 241722 (2018). doi
  6. L. Zhang, J. Han, H. Wang, R. Car, W. E, Deep potential molecular dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 143001 (2018). doi
  7. R. Drautz, Atomic cluster expansion for accurate and transferable interatomic potentials, Phys. Rev. B 99, 014104 (2019). doi
  8. S. Batzner et al., E(3)-equivariant graph neural networks for data-efficient and accurate interatomic potentials (NequIP), Nat. Commun. 13, 2453 (2022). doi
  9. I. Batatia et al., MACE: Higher order equivariant message passing neural networks for fast and accurate force fields, NeurIPS (2022). arXiv:2206.07697
  10. A. Musaelian et al., Learning local equivariant representations for large-scale atomistic dynamics (Allegro), Nat. Commun. 14, 579 (2023). doi
  11. T. W. Ko, J. A. Finkler, S. Goedecker, J. Behler, A fourth-generation high-dimensional neural network potential with accurate electrostatics including non-local charge transfer, Nat. Commun. 12, 398 (2021). doi
  12. O. T. Unke et al., Machine learning force fields, Chem. Rev. 121, 10142 (2021). doi
  13. J. Behler, Four generations of high-dimensional neural network potentials, Chem. Rev. 121, 10037 (2021). doi
  14. X. Fu et al., Forces are not enough: Benchmark and critical evaluation for machine learning force fields with molecular simulations, TMLR (2023). arXiv:2210.07237
  15. I. Batatia et al., A foundation model for atomistic materials chemistry (MACE-MP-0), arXiv:2401.00096

Jupyter Notebooks

References

Useful links

MetaCentrum

History

 

A man adjusting Frank Rosenblatt’s Perceptron, an early iteration of a “neural network” computer, at the Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory in Buffalo around 1960.

Gallery

 

Univerzita Karlova, Matematicko-fyzikální fakulta
Fyzikální ústav UK, Oddělení fyziky biomolekul
Ke Karlovu 3, 121 16 Praha 2
IČ: 00216208, DIČ: CZ00216208